The Extent

The Extent is the Encompassing Ontology contrast against the subject of Observation. Ontology is the regress of a state of being present. When an Ontology encompasses an Ontology. We say that the Extent encompasses a Regress. The Extent is an ontology when it is not the subject. When an ontology encompasses a subject we describe an Extent. The extent is boundary beyond the subject being defined. In fiction predominantly science fiction and fantasy. There is a common trope know as alternate or parallel realities or universe. These are unique separate but connected reality of other planes and or realm of existence. Divergence of probability and or quantum states. The extent is the regress that encompasses, separates, and connect alternate or parallel realities. In geometry two point on the same line are co linear. Two line on the same plane are co plainer. The analogy tend to stop their. But we can continue this analogy further. Two plane within the same solid are co solid.

An ontology is defined as a regress. Like a being that is introverted and extraverted. The regress of the ontology is a threshold which can be defined as interior medial and external. Everything outside the regress of the ontology is external. The boundary of the ontology is the extremity and is medial. Ever thing from the center of the ontology toward  the extremity of the Ontology is its interior. Ever thing beyond the medial is exterior but is encompassed within the External. These properties and their interactions give rise to the nature and quality of the regress.

When the interior of an ontology encompasses an ontology The Regress become more complex give rise to the extent. When Ontology B is Encompassed by Ontology A. The presence of Ontology B within Ontology A Cause Ontology A to be know as Extent A. Extent A Encompasses Ontology B Ontology B is Encompassed within The Interior of Extent A. The External regress of Ontology B is encompassed within the medial boundary of Extent A.

In the context of the formal science. We have establish that a circle is a line drawn parallel to a point. When we describe an infinitely small point with an infinitely long line drawn parallel to it. We describe a infinite circle. In the context of this formal writing if we draw a line from the infinitely small point encompassed within and located at the center of the circle. To  the infinitely long circumference which is the extremity of the infinite circle. We define a radius which is ½ Infinite in length. From this radius emerges a dimeter of 1 infinity which can be used to further describe this circle. Taken as a whole this infinity circle  can be define as an extent. With the edge or curfrance of the circle marking its edge and boundary. When a figure is draw within the infinite circle. The figure is said to be inside the extent.

Utilizing this infinite circle as a frame work to define and describe an Ontological Extent. We can state plainly that within the boundaries of the circle there are several points. In geometry these points are coplanar Inmy02cent we state that these point are co relative to each other. Due to a circle inhearting the attributes of a planer figure. In my02cent the co planer point within the infinite circle are defined as a regress. They inhearent qualite of their being form the circle and the circle inhearets qualities of being from the points. This is how and why an Extent is also an ontological regress. While the analogy works as a simple description for some of nature and quality of  both the Extent and the Regress. In its current definition its is predominantly just a regress.

The emergent Quality of the extent is base exclusively on the principle of observation. When we observe a thing there is always a subject directly being observe an a subject indirectly being observed, “the background.” If we consider our infinite circle. We started with a point in some regress. Then we defined the point as a line drawn parallel to a point. While still inherently an infinity. Our perception as Sentient, cognitive present state beings. Is always a finite abstraction of infinite values. In other words or formal abstraction of a circle subjectively be in an infinite. Is not empirical. But infinity is empirical. Infinity as a nature and quality does infact exist in its own proper context.

What then need to be understood is if we draw or define any figure or subject that must be perceived by our perception. To know or understand the subject in question we must dichotomize its nature and contrast it agist the infinite where in which it is encompassed. Their for if we consider our infinite circle. And objective draw it as a figure with a radius of 1/2in and a diameter of 1in we can formaly abstract that this subject is a representation of infinity. In doing this on a piece of paper that is 8.5in by 11in there is a lot of blank or emptiness that still exist on the paper. This is the contrast against our 1in figure that we are formally implying is infinity.

When we formally perceive in this way the subject is the circle and the contrast is the blank paper or canvas that the figure has been illustrated on. The circumference of the circle is its extremity everything beyond the extremity of the circle is the extent. And the circle becomes the regress. Everything beyond the finite sheet of paper is the extent and the paper now becomes a regress. But in context this can only be true if the paper becomes the subject.